<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GizBuzz &#187; Online office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gizbuzz.co.uk/category/online-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk</link>
	<description>Technology, Computers, Web 2.0, Google, Microsoft, and just about anything else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:02:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google to launch Presentations, Arrington wrong about aim</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/google-to-launch-presentations-arrington-wrong-about-aim/</link>
		<comments>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/google-to-launch-presentations-arrington-wrong-about-aim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/google-to-launch-presentations-arrington-wrong-about-aim/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has just announced that they have acquired Tonic Systems, a company which has already been developing in this area, with the aim of releasing in the summer. According to a post on the Google Blog (incidentally by Sam Schillace, who we interviewed previously for the podcast): We&#8217;ll soon be welcoming a new addition to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/04/were-expecting.html">just announced</a> that they have acquired Tonic Systems, a company which has already been developing in this area, with the aim of releasing in the summer. According to a post on the Google Blog (incidentally by Sam Schillace, who we <a href="http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/podcast-episode-3-google-docs-and-spreadsheets/">interviewed previously</a> for the <a href="http://gizbuzz.co.uk/category/podcasts/">podcast</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;ll soon be welcoming a new addition to the Google Docs &amp; Spreadsheets family: presentations.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is no surprise; they are building a comprehensive online office suite, and presentations were always going to be an integral part of that. As Sam put it in the post, presentations are well suited to collaboration.</p>
<blockquote><p>It just made sense to add presentations to the mix; after all, when you create slides, you&#8217;re almost always going to share them.</p></blockquote>
<p>I disagree with Arrington. He <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/17/googles-office-suite-complete-google-powerpoint-confirmed/">does not believe</a> Schmidt&#8217;s comment at the Web 2.0 Expo that he does not believe that Google Office competes with Microsoft&#8217;s product is genuine. I do think the comment is genuine; Google really does see their product as a collaboration tool, rather than a traditional MS Office equivalent. They&#8217;ve taken the very sensible view that rather than create a rubbish traditional office suite by using a technology not really appropriate, they will create a product that does one thing, collaboration, extremely well, without trying to compete against Microsoft, whose desktop application will always be able to provide more features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/google-to-launch-presentations-arrington-wrong-about-aim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

