<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of Safari</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/the-future-of-safari/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/the-future-of-safari/</link>
	<description>Technology, Computers, Web 2.0, Google, Microsoft, and just about anything else</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/the-future-of-safari/#comment-18878</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/the-future-of-safari/#comment-18878</guid>
		<description>Turning off Java should cure many Safari woes. Not many sites worth visiting still use Java in a big way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turning off Java should cure many Safari woes. Not many sites worth visiting still use Java in a big way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/the-future-of-safari/#comment-18869</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 17:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/the-future-of-safari/#comment-18869</guid>
		<description>On OS X browsers is a sticky issue. Safari is very fast, but does crash reasonably often and renders things in a non-standard way so AJAX applications are a general no. The web is now coded for Firefox and IE, with IE not being an option Firefox seems like a good bet. However it is very slow on OS X. Especially to start. The best middle ground is the Mozilla based Camino. It is fast and OS X integrated but it has standard rendering so you can do your AJAX shizzle too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On OS X browsers is a sticky issue. Safari is very fast, but does crash reasonably often and renders things in a non-standard way so AJAX applications are a general no. The web is now coded for Firefox and IE, with IE not being an option Firefox seems like a good bet. However it is very slow on OS X. Especially to start. The best middle ground is the Mozilla based Camino. It is fast and OS X integrated but it has standard rendering so you can do your AJAX shizzle too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.375 seconds -->
