<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joost launches - the future of TV or a fad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/joost-launches-the-future-of-tv-or-a-fad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/joost-launches-the-future-of-tv-or-a-fad/</link>
	<description>Technology, Computers, Web 2.0, Google, Microsoft, and just about anything else</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/joost-launches-the-future-of-tv-or-a-fad/#comment-24490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 22:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/joost-launches-the-future-of-tv-or-a-fad/#comment-24490</guid>
		<description>Just wondering, how am I supposed to invite someone to joost? I do have an account, but I don't see any "invite" links or such... thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering, how am I supposed to invite someone to joost? I do have an account, but I don&#8217;t see any &#8220;invite&#8221; links or such&#8230; thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/joost-launches-the-future-of-tv-or-a-fad/#comment-24444</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/joost-launches-the-future-of-tv-or-a-fad/#comment-24444</guid>
		<description>Cogent argument - I happen to agree. Both viewers and advertisers benefit from this arrangement...as long as viewers are comfortable with giving up some measure of privacy. 

I would be interested to know 1) what privacy controls are envisioned for the future of Joost; 2) will programming be offered in high definition - HD content is proven to draw more viewers than standard def content; and 3) is there anyone willing to invite me to try Joost? :)

seatrooper at gmail dot com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cogent argument - I happen to agree. Both viewers and advertisers benefit from this arrangement&#8230;as long as viewers are comfortable with giving up some measure of privacy. </p>
<p>I would be interested to know 1) what privacy controls are envisioned for the future of Joost; 2) will programming be offered in high definition - HD content is proven to draw more viewers than standard def content; and 3) is there anyone willing to invite me to try Joost? <img src='http://gizbuzz.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>seatrooper at gmail dot com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ah! &#187; Joost launches today - is it the future of TV or a fad?</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/joost-launches-the-future-of-tv-or-a-fad/#comment-24442</link>
		<dc:creator>ah! &#187; Joost launches today - is it the future of TV or a fad?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2007/joost-launches-the-future-of-tv-or-a-fad/#comment-24442</guid>
		<description>[...] such as CSI and CNN, but will massive bandwidth usage and advertising hamper chances of success?read more &#124; digg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such as CSI and CNN, but will massive bandwidth usage and advertising hamper chances of success?read more | digg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.573 seconds -->
