<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zero-day Firefox vulnerability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/zero-day-firefox-vulnerability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/zero-day-firefox-vulnerability/</link>
	<description>Technology, Computers, Web 2.0, Google, Microsoft, and just about anything else</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Huw</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/zero-day-firefox-vulnerability/#comment-2643</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/zero-day-firefox-vulnerability/#comment-2643</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected! It appears that MS really is making the effort to give IE7 a great reputation of being secure.

Fortunately, I didn't actually put any money on it, so my mistake didn't cost me anything!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected! It appears that MS really is making the effort to give IE7 a great reputation of being secure.</p>
<p>Fortunately, I didn&#8217;t actually put any money on it, so my mistake didn&#8217;t cost me anything!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Fitzsimons</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/zero-day-firefox-vulnerability/#comment-2607</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Fitzsimons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/zero-day-firefox-vulnerability/#comment-2607</guid>
		<description>Huw: Microsoft released a patch for that vulnerability two days ago. See:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/09/29/777193.aspx
for details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huw: Microsoft released a patch for that vulnerability two days ago. See:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/09/29/777193.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/09/29/777193.aspx</a><br />
for details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/zero-day-firefox-vulnerability/#comment-2606</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/zero-day-firefox-vulnerability/#comment-2606</guid>
		<description>For the sake of balance, IE7 has a really bad vulnerability which will allow the execution of arbitary code (installing spyware, trojan- whatever) through some vector displaying thing. This is also unpached the moment, although there is a simple command line fix for it.

I would be prepared to put money on Firefox patching the vulnerability before Microsoft patches theirs - even though the MS one was discovered about a week ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the sake of balance, IE7 has a really bad vulnerability which will allow the execution of arbitary code (installing spyware, trojan- whatever) through some vector displaying thing. This is also unpached the moment, although there is a simple command line fix for it.</p>
<p>I would be prepared to put money on Firefox patching the vulnerability before Microsoft patches theirs - even though the MS one was discovered about a week ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
