Comments on: RSSOwl Review http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/rssowl-review/ Technology, Computers, Web 2.0, Google, Microsoft, and just about anything else Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:36:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: FOSSwire » RSSOwl 2.0 http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/rssowl-review/#comment-65334 FOSSwire » RSSOwl 2.0 Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:11:15 +0000 http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/rssowl-review/#comment-65334 [...] actually have used RSSOwl in the past, back in the 1.x series in August 2006, and posted a review on Gizbuzz (a previous Oratos Media blog). Since then, I was pleasantly surprised with the amount of progress [...] […] actually have used RSSOwl in the past, back in the 1.x series in August 2006, and posted a review on Gizbuzz (a previous Oratos Media blog). Since then, I was pleasantly surprised with the amount of progress […]

]]> By: Gizbuzz » Google Reader Review http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/rssowl-review/#comment-1667 Gizbuzz » Google Reader Review Sat, 02 Sep 2006 14:40:35 +0000 http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/rssowl-review/#comment-1667 [...] I’ve already looked at RSSOwl and decided that at the moment it doesn’t meet what I need. This time, I took a look at Google Reader, which is Google’s more advanced, but more bleeding edge, feed solution. [...] […] I’ve already looked at RSSOwl and decided that at the moment it doesn’t meet what I need. This time, I took a look at Google Reader, which is Google’s more advanced, but more bleeding edge, feed solution. […]

]]> By: Peter http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/rssowl-review/#comment-1036 Peter Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:48:05 +0000 http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/rssowl-review/#comment-1036 Thanks for the tips, Ben. Although I was quite critical (particulary of the interface), RSSOwl isn't far off the solution I'm looking for. If you add an at-a-glance view mode (to see all feeds at once) and do up the interface a bit, I'll definitely come back and take another look. Thanks for the tips, Ben. Although I was quite critical (particulary of the interface), RSSOwl isn’t far off the solution I’m looking for.

If you add an at-a-glance view mode (to see all feeds at once) and do up the interface a bit, I’ll definitely come back and take another look.

]]> By: Benjamin Pasero http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/rssowl-review/#comment-1034 Benjamin Pasero Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:07:43 +0000 http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/rssowl-review/#comment-1034 Hi Peter, some comments: - You can enable the internal Browser via "View" > "Display Newstext in Browser". On Linux there are some requirements to get it done so its not enabled by default. The FAQ will open automatically and give you the details once you try to enable the Browser - You can drag and drop Feeds from Firefox into RSSOwl. Better support for Firefox is planned for the future (e.g. automatic addition of Feeds from Firefox) Ben Hi Peter,

some comments:

- You can enable the internal Browser via “View” > “Display Newstext in Browser”. On Linux there are some requirements to get it done so its not enabled by default. The FAQ will open automatically and give you the details once you try to enable the Browser

- You can drag and drop Feeds from Firefox into RSSOwl. Better support for Firefox is planned for the future (e.g. automatic addition of Feeds from Firefox)

Ben

]]> By: Peter’s Web Development Blog » Blog Archive » My RSSOwl review http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/rssowl-review/#comment-997 Peter’s Web Development Blog » Blog Archive » My RSSOwl review Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:29:59 +0000 http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/rssowl-review/#comment-997 [...] Just finished my review of RSSOwl that I promised. It was a bit critcal - particularly of the interface, but at the moment it just doesn’t meet my needs. Still, I mentioned that, the cool features that are there and what I think the RSSOwl development team should do next. [...] […] Just finished my review of RSSOwl that I promised. It was a bit critcal - particularly of the interface, but at the moment it just doesn’t meet my needs. Still, I mentioned that, the cool features that are there and what I think the RSSOwl development team should do next. […]

]]>