<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live.com goes live - but why is Microsoft being so inconsistent?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/livecom-goes-live-but-why-is-microsoft-being-so-inconsistent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/livecom-goes-live-but-why-is-microsoft-being-so-inconsistent/</link>
	<description>Technology, Computers, Web 2.0, Google, Microsoft, and just about anything else</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/livecom-goes-live-but-why-is-microsoft-being-so-inconsistent/#comment-2002</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/livecom-goes-live-but-why-is-microsoft-being-so-inconsistent/#comment-2002</guid>
		<description>The homepage looks very strange, javascript being wrongly implemented... very strange... looks fine here though.

I think they'll rebrand it as Live.  My bet is this is a service that was being developed before Live, but during the shuffle it got a bit lost.  Then YouTube came and took over, and voila - Microsoft brought back Soapbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The homepage looks very strange, javascript being wrongly implemented&#8230; very strange&#8230; looks fine here though.</p>
<p>I think they&#8217;ll rebrand it as Live.  My bet is this is a service that was being developed before Live, but during the shuffle it got a bit lost.  Then YouTube came and took over, and voila - Microsoft brought back Soapbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
