<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LimeWire fights back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/limewire-fights-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/limewire-fights-back/</link>
	<description>Technology, Computers, Web 2.0, Google, Microsoft, and just about anything else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:45:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/limewire-fights-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/limewire-fights-back/#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll disagree and say that yes, it&#039;ll be tough, but I can feasibly see LimeWire winning.  The RIAA wants total control over the methods that are used to deliver their media and that&#039;s simply not legal.  LimeWire was doing something (though I doubt the effectiveness of this method) to combat piracy and the RIAA STILL stopped it, showing that the true reason they&#039;re fighting piracy is the lack of control they have over it.  If they owned LimeWire (or at least destroyed them in a lawsuit) they&#039;d effectively have control over the company&#039;s actions which is what they really want.  It&#039;s not about the piracy, they can sustain that loss - it&#039;s about controlling the distribution channel.

Sorry if I&#039;m more incoherent than normal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll disagree and say that yes, it&#8217;ll be tough, but I can feasibly see LimeWire winning.  The RIAA wants total control over the methods that are used to deliver their media and that&#8217;s simply not legal.  LimeWire was doing something (though I doubt the effectiveness of this method) to combat piracy and the RIAA STILL stopped it, showing that the true reason they&#8217;re fighting piracy is the lack of control they have over it.  If they owned LimeWire (or at least destroyed them in a lawsuit) they&#8217;d effectively have control over the company&#8217;s actions which is what they really want.  It&#8217;s not about the piracy, they can sustain that loss &#8211; it&#8217;s about controlling the distribution channel.</p>
<p>Sorry if I&#8217;m more incoherent than normal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

