<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LimeWire fights back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/limewire-fights-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/limewire-fights-back/</link>
	<description>Technology, Computers, Web 2.0, Google, Microsoft, and just about anything else</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/limewire-fights-back/#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/limewire-fights-back/#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>I'll disagree and say that yes, it'll be tough, but I can feasibly see LimeWire winning.  The RIAA wants total control over the methods that are used to deliver their media and that's simply not legal.  LimeWire was doing something (though I doubt the effectiveness of this method) to combat piracy and the RIAA STILL stopped it, showing that the true reason they're fighting piracy is the lack of control they have over it.  If they owned LimeWire (or at least destroyed them in a lawsuit) they'd effectively have control over the company's actions which is what they really want.  It's not about the piracy, they can sustain that loss - it's about controlling the distribution channel.

Sorry if I'm more incoherent than normal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll disagree and say that yes, it&#8217;ll be tough, but I can feasibly see LimeWire winning.  The RIAA wants total control over the methods that are used to deliver their media and that&#8217;s simply not legal.  LimeWire was doing something (though I doubt the effectiveness of this method) to combat piracy and the RIAA STILL stopped it, showing that the true reason they&#8217;re fighting piracy is the lack of control they have over it.  If they owned LimeWire (or at least destroyed them in a lawsuit) they&#8217;d effectively have control over the company&#8217;s actions which is what they really want.  It&#8217;s not about the piracy, they can sustain that loss - it&#8217;s about controlling the distribution channel.</p>
<p>Sorry if I&#8217;m more incoherent than normal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
