<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.0 (Gran Paradiso) Alpha 1 released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/firefox-30-gran-paradiso-alpha-1-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/firefox-30-gran-paradiso-alpha-1-released/</link>
	<description>Technology, Computers, Web 2.0, Google, Microsoft, and just about anything else</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Huw</title>
		<link>http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/firefox-30-gran-paradiso-alpha-1-released/#comment-7578</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizbuzz.co.uk/2006/firefox-30-gran-paradiso-alpha-1-released/#comment-7578</guid>
		<description>FF has an interesting problem - the ability to use extensions means that you can choose which killer features you want - obviously great. However, this means that it lacks a unique selling point going forward. Both IE7 and FF have tabs. They are both about as secure as each other.

FF is obviously the best browser, but it's better to everyone for different reasons, making marketing harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FF has an interesting problem - the ability to use extensions means that you can choose which killer features you want - obviously great. However, this means that it lacks a unique selling point going forward. Both IE7 and FF have tabs. They are both about as secure as each other.</p>
<p>FF is obviously the best browser, but it&#8217;s better to everyone for different reasons, making marketing harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
